LawEvidence Lawintermediate

Hearsay Evidence

/ˈhɪərseɪ ˈɛvɪdəns/

Evidence Law Term

Images

CC-licensed · free to use
More on Wikimedia
Loading images…

Video

Definition

Out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of its contents. Generally inadmissible with exceptions.

Jurisdiction: International

Etymology

From the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, drafted by James Fitzjames Stephen. Terms trace to Latin evidentem ('obvious') and English common law evidentiary principles.

Examples

A witness saying 'Ram told me the accused was at the crime scene' is hearsay — Ram must testify directly if his statement is to be used as evidence.
A dying declaration — 'before dying, the victim named the killer to the doctor' — is admissible as an exception under Section 32(1) Evidence Act.

Case Study

In Khushal Rao v. State of Bombay (1958), the Supreme Court held that a dying declaration can form the sole basis for conviction provided it is voluntary, consistent, and made in a fit mental state. Courts laid down detailed guidelines for assessing dying declarations.

History & Origin

The legal concept of 'Hearsay' has developed through centuries of legal evolution, emerging from the interplay of common law, equity, and statutory development that has shaped the Anglo-Indian legal tradition. Like many legal principles, its precise contours have been defined not by a single moment of creation but through the gradual accumulation of judicial decisions, legislative enactments, and scholarly commentary. In the English common law tradition, from which much of Indian law derives, legal principles typically emerged through judicial decisions responding to specific disputes. Judges developed general rules from individual cases — a process of inductive reasoning that gave common law its characteristic pragmatism and flexibility. Over centuries, these case-by-case developments were synthesised by legal commentators and later codified in statutes. The introduction of English legal principles to India occurred through the gradual expansion of British colonial administration. The establishment of the Supreme Courts of Judicature in Calcutta (1774), Bombay (1823), and Madras (1801) brought English common law and equity to bear on matters involving British subjects. After 1858, the High Courts Act consolidated these courts, and following independence, India retained and adapted this inherited legal framework. Hearsay as applied in Indian law reflects Out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of its contents. Generally inadmissible with excep. The Indian courts — particularly the Supreme Court and the High Courts — have played a crucial role in interpreting and adapting inherited legal concepts to India's constitutional and social context. The concept continues to evolve through ongoing judicial interpretation and occasional legislative reform. Law Commission Reports, academic scholarship, and comparative jurisprudence from other common law jurisdictions all contribute to its development. This ongoing evolution reflects the living nature of law — its capacity to adapt to changing social conditions while maintaining the continuity and predictability that the rule of law requires. For practitioners and students of Indian law, understanding this historical and jurisprudential background is essential to a full appreciation of how legal principles function in today's complex legal landscape.

Key Cases

Khushal Rao v. State of Bombay

1958

AIR 1958 SC 22

Dying declaration can be sole basis for conviction if voluntary, consistent, and made in a fit state of mind. Laid down authoritative guidelines for assessing dying declarations under Section 32(1) Evidence Act.

View on Indian Kanoon →

Also Known As

second-hand evidence

Synonyms

legal termlegal conceptjudicial termlaw term

Antonyms / Opposites

direct evidencetestimony

Related Terms

dying declarationSection 32 Evidence ActadmissibilityconfessionadmissionsSection 17 Evidence Act

Dictionary Entry

← Back to Law Dictionary