Legal Positivism
/ˈliːɡəl ˈpɒzɪtɪvɪzəm/
Jurisprudential Theory
Images
CC-licensed · free to useVideo
Definition
A school of jurisprudential thought holding that law is a social fact — it is what is enacted by a sovereign authority (legislature, court) and has no necessary connection with morality. Key proponents: Jeremy Bentham, John Austin (law is the command of a sovereign), and H.L.A. Hart (law as a system of primary rules + secondary rules of recognition). A law may be immoral but still valid if enacted through proper legal processes.
Examples
Case Study
In A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950), the majority took a positivist approach — Article 21 requires only procedure prescribed by law, however harsh. Any enacted law satisfies Article 21. Maneka Gandhi (1978) later departed from this strict positivism and adopted a natural-justice-influenced approach.
Key Cases
A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras
1950AIR 1950 SC 27
Early positivist interpretation of Article 21 — any procedure prescribed by law satisfies the constitutional requirement, regardless of fairness. Later overruled in spirit by Maneka Gandhi (1978). Classic example of legal positivism in Indian constitutional adjudication.
View on Indian Kanoon →